阅江学刊

海德格尔用“此在”来代替人，就是达到一种去人格化，但是他的去人格化过程又是要强调“此在”的“主体性”,这又是要把“此在”人格化。其实他的“此在”概念的核心是要把人格与角色结合在一起。阿多诺认为，当海德格尔把人格与角色结合在一起的时候，他表面上使“此在”具有主体性，但是其实使“此在”成为系统中的角色，否定了“此在”的主体性。阿多诺从辩证法的角度来理解人格与角色的关系，即人不可避免地成为角色，但是人又在自己的自我意识中对抗这个角色。阿多诺强调反思和意识的作用，而马克思则强调，人通过自己改造世界的活动使自己获得自由。

Heidegger's use of Dasein to replace man is to achieve a kind of depersonalization,but his depersonalization process is to emphasize the “subjectivity”of Dasein,which is to personify Dasein. In fact,the core of his concept of Dasein is to combine personality with role. Adorno believes that when Heidegger combines personality and role,he superficially makes Dasein subjectivity,but in fact it is Dasein becoming a role in the system, which negates the subjectivity of Dasein. Adorno understands the relationship between personality and role from the perspective of dialectics,that is,people inevitably become roles,but people confront this role in their own self-consciousness. Adorno emphasized the role of reflection and consciousness,while Marx emphasized that people make themselves free through their own activities of transforming the world.